Nigerian sprinter Okagbare banned for 10 years for doping and failing to co-operate with investigation
Blessing Okagbare of Team Nigeria competes during round one of the Women’s 100m heats on day seven of the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games at Olympic Stadium on July 30, 2021 in Tokyo, Japan. (Photo by Patrick Smith/Getty Images)
LAUSANNE, February 18, 2022 – Nigerian sprinter Blessing Okagbare has been issued a 10-year ban on Friday by the Disciplinary Tribunal of the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU). “Five years for the presence and use of multiple prohibited substances and five years for her refusal to co-operate with the AIU’s investigation into her case,” the AIU said in a press release.
The Beijing 2008 long jump silver medallist was provisionally suspended on July 30, 2021 during the Tokyo Olympics, where she was due to compete in the 100m semi-final on the same day, after testing positive for human growth hormone (HGH) in an out-of-competition test on July 19.
Okagbare was later, in October, charged with three anti-doping offences – two related to testing positive for banned substances and one for not cooperating with an investigation. The second doping charge was in relation to the presence of recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) in an out-of-competition sample collected on June 20 in Nigeria. The 33-year-old denied all charges and requested that each of them be submitted to a hearing before a disciplinary tribunal.
Head of the AIU Brett Clothier said: “We welcome the decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal; a ban of 10-years is a strong message against intentional and co-ordinated attempts to cheat at the very highest level of our sport.”
In addition to her Olympic medal, Okagbare is a milti-time African champion, a two-time Commonwealth Games gold medallist thanks two her 100 and 200m triumph in Glasgow 2014, as well as a long jump silver medallist and 200m bronze medallist at the 2013 World Championships in Moscow.
AIU PRESS RELEASE
The Disciplinary Tribunal has banned Nigerian sprinter Blessing Okagbare for a total of 10 years, five years for the presence and use of multiple prohibited substances and five years for her refusal to co-operate with the AIU’s investigation into her case.
The sole arbitrator adjudicating the case concluded that the athlete’s use of multiple prohibited substances as part of an organised doping regimen in the lead up to the Tokyo Olympic Games was egregious conduct that amounted to aggravating circumstances under the Rules thereby warranting an additional period of ineligibility on top of the standard four-year sanction.
The sole arbitrator also recognised the AIU’s right to carry out investigations, including the imaging of electronic devices, and to impose sanctions when an athlete refuses to co-operate with an investigation and thereby frustrates the AIU’s ability to fulfil its mandate to protect the integrity of the sport of athletics. In this instance, the sole arbitrator concluded that the athlete’s refusal to cooperate had denied the AIU the opportunity to discover evidence of possible further rule violations by her as well possible violations of the rules by others, for which he imposed an additional sanction of five years.
“We welcome the decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal; a ban of 10-year is a strong message against intentional and co-ordinated attempts to cheat at the very highest level of our sport. This is an outcome that was driven by our intelligence-led target testing as well as our commitment to investigate the circumstances behind a positive test,” said Brett Clothier, Head of the AIU.
On 07 October 2021, the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) had pressed charges against Ms Okagbare in relation to separate disciplinary matters. First, for the presence and use of multiple (two) prohibited substances (human Growth Hormone (hGH) and recombinant erythropoietin (EPO)) for which Ms Okagbare had been provisionally suspended on 31 July 2021, the day on which she had been scheduled to participate in the semi-finals of the Tokyo 2020 women’s 100m. Subsequently, in accordance with Rule 12 of the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules, she was charged with a refusal to co-operate with the AIU’s investigation into her case.
The athlete has the right to appeal against the Disciplinary Tribunal’s decision at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) within 30-days. The reasoned decision can be accessed here.
The Beijing 2008 long jump silver medallist was provisionally suspended on July 30, 2021 during the Tokyo Olympics, where she was due to compete in the 100m semi-final on the same day, after testing positive for human growth hormone (HGH) in an out-of-competition test on July 19.
Okagbare was later, in October, charged with three anti-doping offences – two related to testing positive for banned substances and one for not cooperating with an investigation. The second doping charge was in relation to the presence of recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) in an out-of-competition sample collected on June 20 in Nigeria. The 33-year-old denied all charges and requested that each of them be submitted to a hearing before a disciplinary tribunal.
Head of the AIU Brett Clothier said: “We welcome the decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal; a ban of 10-years is a strong message against intentional and co-ordinated attempts to cheat at the very highest level of our sport.”
In addition to her Olympic medal, Okagbare is a milti-time African champion, a two-time Commonwealth Games gold medallist thanks two her 100 and 200m triumph in Glasgow 2014, as well as a long jump silver medallist and 200m bronze medallist at the 2013 World Championships in Moscow.
AIU PRESS RELEASE
The Disciplinary Tribunal has banned Nigerian sprinter Blessing Okagbare for a total of 10 years, five years for the presence and use of multiple prohibited substances and five years for her refusal to co-operate with the AIU’s investigation into her case.
The sole arbitrator adjudicating the case concluded that the athlete’s use of multiple prohibited substances as part of an organised doping regimen in the lead up to the Tokyo Olympic Games was egregious conduct that amounted to aggravating circumstances under the Rules thereby warranting an additional period of ineligibility on top of the standard four-year sanction.
The sole arbitrator also recognised the AIU’s right to carry out investigations, including the imaging of electronic devices, and to impose sanctions when an athlete refuses to co-operate with an investigation and thereby frustrates the AIU’s ability to fulfil its mandate to protect the integrity of the sport of athletics. In this instance, the sole arbitrator concluded that the athlete’s refusal to cooperate had denied the AIU the opportunity to discover evidence of possible further rule violations by her as well possible violations of the rules by others, for which he imposed an additional sanction of five years.
“We welcome the decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal; a ban of 10-year is a strong message against intentional and co-ordinated attempts to cheat at the very highest level of our sport. This is an outcome that was driven by our intelligence-led target testing as well as our commitment to investigate the circumstances behind a positive test,” said Brett Clothier, Head of the AIU.
On 07 October 2021, the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) had pressed charges against Ms Okagbare in relation to separate disciplinary matters. First, for the presence and use of multiple (two) prohibited substances (human Growth Hormone (hGH) and recombinant erythropoietin (EPO)) for which Ms Okagbare had been provisionally suspended on 31 July 2021, the day on which she had been scheduled to participate in the semi-finals of the Tokyo 2020 women’s 100m. Subsequently, in accordance with Rule 12 of the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules, she was charged with a refusal to co-operate with the AIU’s investigation into her case.
The athlete has the right to appeal against the Disciplinary Tribunal’s decision at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) within 30-days. The reasoned decision can be accessed here.
Video gallery
Let's Talk to the IOC Presidential Candidates
Let's Talk to IOC Presidential Candidate Lord Sebastian Coe
